I was saying pretty much exactly what this thread says on the radio earlier.
It's not about a war with the civil service but harnessing the frustration *within* the civil service to put forward a systematic reform programme.
It's not about a war with the civil service but harnessing the frustration *within* the civil service to put forward a systematic reform programme.
Reposted from
Amy Gandon
Reflecting on Starmer’s comments on the CS yday and on the response it’s got in Whitehall since.
If there’s any piece of advice I’d give Starmer - and at this fragile juncture I want to shout it from the rooftops - it would be:
‘Blame the system, not the people’.
🧵
If there’s any piece of advice I’d give Starmer - and at this fragile juncture I want to shout it from the rooftops - it would be:
‘Blame the system, not the people’.
🧵
Comments
Sometimes slowness etc is designed into the system for good reason as well as bad.
Need a decent devils advocate and to understand the cost and likelihoods of false positives or opportunity costs etc.
But attacking all officials just means everyone gets alienated.
They've also had 14 years of inept ministers blaming them for ministerial ineptitude.
Streeting risked the same thing when he talked about managing out poor managers.
Sure there are people you might want to incentivise to retire, put on a PIP etc, but broad brush criticism off your staff just opens up a whole world of other problems
That’s the message I took and exactly what it should be.
A demand, given the urgency of our times”…….
“Less hostile to devolution and letting things go”
I’m not sure how else to read into that.
Ministers often said 'just do it' and officials wld highlight eg legal or funding issues, time needed to get new processes right, etc.
Ministers would then say they are being 'frustrated'