because it is so obviously not the real transcript a reader would know that it is an interpretation of an exchange put in the form of a transcript to communicate a formal exchange.
why are people losing their shit over this?
I believe it is @marquelawyers.bsky.social take on the Trump-Zelenskyy exchange. Those words were not 'actually said' during the exchange, however, it is an accurate representation of the sentiment.
because it is so obviously not the real transcript a reader would know that it is an interpretation of an exchange put in the form of a transcript to communicate a formal exchange.
why are people losing their shit over this?
We live in a world awash with misinformation and ever shortening attention spans. We don't need this slop that will then get ingested into some AI and be presented as "Fact" in the future.
because it is so obviously not the real transcript a reader would know that it is an interpretation of an exchange put in the form of a transcript to communicate a formal exchange.
why are people losing their shit over this?
because it is so obviously not the real transcript a reader would know that it is an interpretation of an exchange put in the form of a transcript to communicate a formal exchange.
why are people losing their shit over this?
it was written by marque lawyers, a bunch of legal scholars, educators and advocates. If you saw the original and then read that post, would the real meaning be different? no. Different data, same information.
Check this video out
He explains a lot about how Russia wants to destroy America, and the question now is how much did Frump play in this plan with Putin or was he just used by Putin and how much did the Muskrat play in this with Putin? https://youtu.be/2YufwvWmQOQ?...
because it is so obviously not the real transcript a reader would know that it is an interpretation of an exchange put in the form of a transcript to communicate a formal exchange. Think: literary device.
jesus, why are people losing their shit over this?
Sorry mate. But the way it was presented suggested it was a word for word account...there was no indication that it was an interpretation of what was said ...
The fact that it was obviously not a transcript (we’ve all read or heard the exchange) suggests that the writer believed his readers were sophisticated enough to get it. Silly writer
Like how there is no sarcasm emoji, you’re supposed to be able to figure it out on your own
It’s not a transcript at all. It’s a satirical summary of the vibe of that meeting put into the form of a transcript to communicate that it was from that exchange.
The writer clearly overestimated the sophistication of his audience
Bingo! You got the point.
It summarises the vibe. He doesn’t say it’s a true transcript, but putting it in a transcript form is what communicates the vibe.
Comments
https://bsky.app/profile/pbsnews.org/post/3ljblj3dthu24
Portable tactical nuclear weapons to catch grandpa when he gets out of his bunker.
He is my shining light, the person I would like to be.
why are people losing their shit over this?
Also
Here it the complete Trump-Zelenskyy video.
https://youtu.be/kEOv4x_FIsc?si=I9d5FqfLKb23DbZ3
why are people losing their shit over this?
why are people losing their shit over this?
I guess it's ok when it's *our* side riding roughshod over facts.
why are people losing their shit over this?
He explains a lot about how Russia wants to destroy America, and the question now is how much did Frump play in this plan with Putin or was he just used by Putin and how much did the Muskrat play in this with Putin?
https://youtu.be/2YufwvWmQOQ?...
jesus, why are people losing their shit over this?
Like how there is no sarcasm emoji, you’re supposed to be able to figure it out on your own
The Gospels are an example.
The writer clearly overestimated the sophistication of his audience
Excellent summation of the vibe, but not the words used.
It summarises the vibe. He doesn’t say it’s a true transcript, but putting it in a transcript form is what communicates the vibe.