if the american academy of pediatrics is saying the hhs report was based off an incredibly limited amount of data and distorted the medical consensus,
the journalism about the report should mirror that, too.
link to full statement: https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/news-releases/aap/2025/aap-statement-on-hhs-report-treatment-for-pediatric-gender-dysphoria/
the journalism about the report should mirror that, too.
link to full statement: https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/news-releases/aap/2025/aap-statement-on-hhs-report-treatment-for-pediatric-gender-dysphoria/
Comments
you can “both sides” a political debate
but consensus means a shared view of the facts across all sides
if we applied that same logic to climate change, the journalism would be labeled denialist
On one side, a seismologist. On the other side, someone who believes earthquakes are caused by a giant underground bull tossing the earth on its horns .........."
https://glaad.org/gap/american-college-pediatricians/