ACLU: Washington Post article! Reported about internal memo. Found no evidence of antisemitic behavior, terrorist anything—nothing beyond op-ed!
Judge: So there is a memorandum in the govt's possession that has not been produced to you?
ACLU: Yes. And we believe there are two of them.
Judge: So there is a memorandum in the govt's possession that has not been produced to you?
ACLU: Yes. And we believe there are two of them.
Comments
ACLU: No. Guilt by association. Chilling example of 1A violation. Reminiscent of red scare.
It sure sounds like Ms. Ozturk is caught in a ridiculous Catch 22 that disregards her Constitutional rights having been violated.
ACLU: We do believe there's a basis to grant bail right now, but we think alternative could also work—as long as happens urgently.
DOJ: On bail, our threshold position is, considering Jennings, Velasco Lopez, there's a question of whether court is permitted to release. Our argument is court doesn't have jurisdiction.
Judge: There are multiple concerns. Petitioners argue Ozturk's own 1A rights are violated. Second, how arrest happened, whether permitted to know where she was going, etc. Denied ability to get to court.