AI witch hunts by non-professionals seem to universally forget that 1) Bad Photoshop Still Exists and 2) I Dunno, Sometimes Photos Just Look Kinda Weird and Uncanny
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
and also..... IT'S ABOUT THE MONEY! There is no promise land, there's no spaceship, they took all the money, and they ran off to the next town to swindle the local fools from their monies!
People were losing their shit shouting “that WOMAN in the BACKGROUND is REPEATED!” and drawing red circles around her; the tool that made the red circles is literally a few squares below the clone brush and the object select tool.
Theres this Hugo Boss and featuring David Beckham I keep seeing where it looks like they photoshopped his face on another model. I think it's actually just bad lighting but it's really bad.
photography is not immune from apparent anatomical mistakes! I can't count the number of times that I've seen an unedited reference photo with anatomy that looks "wrong" or what appears to be a hand missing fingers—sometimes it's just a really weird angle https://www.reddit.com/r/confusing_perspective/
Yes! “I can tell AI made this shitty poster!?” my friend, shitty posters transcend time and technology. I have a Zip disks from 1999 with Photoshop work that is a direct affront to GOD.
Ppl can still suck at stuff, all on their own, and that is ok.
it genuinely HURTS to see people say that AURORA's new collab visualiser is AI when it's so clearly just animated in a certain way, people just point to anything and say "AI!??!?!" now
Comments
People were losing their shit shouting “that WOMAN in the BACKGROUND is REPEATED!” and drawing red circles around her; the tool that made the red circles is literally a few squares below the clone brush and the object select tool.
A mistake a human would make: Somehow leaving the lens cap on AND having the ISO up so high you get a blown out photo of JUST the lens cap.
Not impossible. But very hard.
Ppl can still suck at stuff, all on their own, and that is ok.