Strong disagree, but we *should* call them tosets.

We’re clearly missing a bunch of fundamental mathematical objects. If we have cosets, posets, and tosets, where are the bosets, josets, mosets, xosets, etc.?
Reposted from Jessamyn Dukes
just remembered that yesterday I suggested in rings and fields class that we rename totally ordered sets as completely ordered sets so we can call them cosets

everyone was so mad, it was beautiful

Comments

Posting Rules

  • Be respectful to others
  • No spam or self-promotion
  • Stay on topic
  • Follow Bluesky's terms of service