This piece turned out more frightening than I'd really intended. But sometimes you write your way through your thoughts and find they're more alarmed than you'd like.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/12/opinion/ai-climate-change-low-birth-rates.html?unlocked_article_code=1.o04.970N.vx2aBZPJh4yI&smid=url-share
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/12/opinion/ai-climate-change-low-birth-rates.html?unlocked_article_code=1.o04.970N.vx2aBZPJh4yI&smid=url-share
Comments
I’m old enough to remember the scary “population bomb” 40 years ago.
Tax the rich!
The failure to meet the needs of civilization, including a sustainable climate agenda, was a betrayal committed by the democracies.
Actually looking forward to it.
AI uses a lot of energy for example. Will that stay like that? I am not sure. Look at the energy consumption of the human brain than you see what is possible if AI models get more energy efficient.
WHY did Musk/Theil buy Trump and with whom?
What is the biggest, unsolvable problem with USA?
What is the polycrisis?
Why is medical fertility failing?
What is our risk to adequate food? Financial bubble from insurance?
Ai...pfffft. Get real. Look at the actual issues.
I think the bottom might fall out due to sneaky incremental replacement (by bots) before that happens.