Sorry, but this Luddite response is just sad and ill informed. There are two paths for teachers in the short term, learn to maximize their own effectiveness with these tools or ignore them till they are replaced by them. Either way you have about 3-5 year’s to wrestle with that.
Comments
Also, Luddites weren’t anti-technology; they were pro-worker, and opposed to the enshitification of their craft. If they were anti anything, they were anti-exploitation, exactly the right stance to take in an era of AI-hype.
And shifted goalposts aside, if you think AI won’t replace almost every worker in world, specifically coming for white collar workers first, you’re delusional.
Mathy-maths may be able to act as aids for very specific tasks, like writing form emails. This won’t lead to the replacement of teachers, whose job is much, much more than simply extruding information at students.
However, as an ML engineer and researcher, I can say with certainty that a product that does not exist can’t be imminently deployed.
Is disruption coming? Of course! But at “everyone is getting replaced in 5 years” scale? That’s fear mongering with no basis in reality.