Editors in publishing that are cool with using A.I. for covers and marketing assets, A.I. for summaries of the book and other copy, ChatGPT for whatever, pushing authors to allow A.I. companies to use their books--babes you are next.
You're being used to dig your own grave. Pish back now or perish.
You're being used to dig your own grave. Pish back now or perish.
Comments
I was like man how long until the company decides 90% is good enough and eliminates your position? 🤦
Humans give things magic (and realistic value) that AI may never be able to replicate.
Pretty much the logic at display with a lot of people that are ok with AI.
2nd is they may not want to use crappy art but they relied on the cheap or free option and are now stuck on a deadline.
Or it's laziness that goes unpunished
Almost blocked you on sight but I was curious about the disconnection between your userpic and your statement.
Also, your new userpic is great--it's lovely to talk to a real face!
There was a big push for acceptance and adoption in graphic design spaces early on and a bunch of designers on social media seem to be getting caught in layoffs recently.
But they're not, for some reason.🤔
This to me is a revealing data point that needs to be emphasized every time they propose replacing anyone else's job.
If ever there was a career path to be replaced by AI...
Also, Watson suuuuuuuuhhhcks on the ESPN Fantasy Sports app
Climate change, AI, "global upheaval" if you will.
I'm 53. I like to keep informed. I'm sorry but I'm scared for us all.
I'm sorry that you are scared (glad you made it to 53 tho!), but if fear was the indicator for our ability to fight for necessary changes, we wouldn't (or at least certainly not I as an objectively free Black person) would not exist.
Needs to be illegal to NOT clearly mark something as AI generated.
If you try to pass something off ad human generated, but it is no? go to jail.