The point of the CPS "Here to Stay?" paper is v much about the question mark.
Implicit title is "Here to Stay - or Remigration?" or "Here to Stay - or can we send them back?"
In flying a remigration kite, it takes care to duck all the key questions about the proposal
https://cps.org.uk/research/here-to-stay-estimating-the-scale-and-cost-of-long-term-migration/
Implicit title is "Here to Stay - or Remigration?" or "Here to Stay - or can we send them back?"
In flying a remigration kite, it takes care to duck all the key questions about the proposal
https://cps.org.uk/research/here-to-stay-estimating-the-scale-and-cost-of-long-term-migration/
Comments
"Of course" it wants many to stay. "moral obligation"
NB: CPS make no attempt to quantify this group: they do not estimate % they think *should* stay.
(Doing that would cut the 800k number)
If they’ve spent 5 years building themselves a life here, why would we want them to leave?
But there is no "implicit contract"
[do courts agree?]
"But we still have a window to prevent the permanent resettlement here of a great many people [here now]" [& who we could ask to leave if we now changed the rules v quickly]
NB: CPS makes no attempt to quantify this group. Propose a "pause", a "review" and "exemptions - by salary, occupation & nationality". (Not "ethnicity/faith" though "nationality" has enough overlap if anyone did want to target that)
* 10-15 years, not 5 years, is niche
* people would have salary thresholds for work visas. But most wouldn't not refuse settlement/citizenship (across caregories) purely with a fiscal calculator.
Is there a name for classifying and labelling human beings in such terms ?
It can thus be inferred that proportion of British intending to vote for Reform is higher than 25%
I meant obvs stupid to be *deliberately* so sweepingly inaccurate given quite so many ways people set foot in the UK, as tourists, visitors, students, post-graduates, temp visas & other statuses that don't lead to settlement