As explained in a previous blogpost on the topic (https://gateklons.substack.com/p/edpbs-problematic-opinion-on-consent) this "less personalized option" is just regulatory make-believe, not based on the law. Reminder: Art. 5(2) also excludes legitimate interests as a valid legal basis.
Comments
The amount of "regulatory dialogue" described in the decision is beyond absurd and unnecessary: Meta's conduct is already illegal on its face.