Despite the call here to understand regenerative agriculture as an "ongoing continuum," it's more often treated as a binary -- ag is either regenerative or not. That's a silly way to think about food production and distracts from what's most important -- OUTCOMES for people and the planet.
Reposted from
Richard Waite
So…”regenerative agriculture” is everything
Comments
I welcome something based on outcomes and measurement, but wonder if the regen term is already too widely understood as a narrower set of soil health practices.