I leave it to voters to determine that.
For instance, I don't think it is for you or me to tell voters that they should or shouldn't care whether the mayor broke a campaign promise. That's up to them.
For instance, I don't think it is for you or me to tell voters that they should or shouldn't care whether the mayor broke a campaign promise. That's up to them.
Comments
That is, even if on average information is average, it has an effect on average.
The result doesn't depend on most info being bad.
Campaign promise to reduce foreign travel has got to be one of the least important aspects of the disaster. Interesting WaPost, NYT and commentators outside SoCal are making issue of that instead of….
Climate change.
Just not in your role as a social scientist.
Anyway, I think we agree on the conceptual matter.
I hope you and yours are safe.
I was referring to my earlier point about voters caring about campaign promises.
I can imagine reasonable voters who think that vote-relevant, even if they agree it has nothing to do with fire response. (Can also imagine reasonable voters who think it an unimportant triviality.)
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-01-10/how-much-did-the-l-a-fire-department-really-cut-its-budget