Transphobes love their catch-22:
(1) If it’s not a long-term RCT (or at least prospective cohort study), they say it’s not a strong enough methodology.
(2) If it is, they say that, being a long-term study, it’s too old and doesn’t reflect current clinical realities anymore.
(1) If it’s not a long-term RCT (or at least prospective cohort study), they say it’s not a strong enough methodology.
(2) If it is, they say that, being a long-term study, it’s too old and doesn’t reflect current clinical realities anymore.
Reposted from
Florence Ashley
In honour of transphobes publishing more nonsense about trans healthcare having insufficient evidence, I want to share two critical articles on the topic.
This first article explains that trans people have a right to gender-affirming care, and that “”not enough proof”” isn’t enough to ban it.
This first article explains that trans people have a right to gender-affirming care, and that “”not enough proof”” isn’t enough to ban it.
Comments