Top comments for the post are 1) send articles that say ai detection doesn't work, 2) escalate to the dean, and 3) use ai detectors on unrelated original documents like the teacher's email.
This is why the approach is so key: even though the teacher communicated the use of the tool, it's flawed
This is why the approach is so key: even though the teacher communicated the use of the tool, it's flawed
Comments
- Is it too generic?
- Are they not demonstrating their thought process?
The standards should not just be even-handed to the student, but should also reflect effective evaluation