Twitter has a simple epistemology: posts and community notes. To assert Dittman is Musk is probably incorrect, some of the time. But the model assumes some sense of permament “fact”
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
If you’re hellbent on learning the truth with the presumption you are dealing with a trickster, don’t use the tools you are handed. Moreover, think about how those tools guide your senses
Community notes are fantastic, interesting, often even funny. But they serve primarily as a counterweight, present a sense you are supposed to choose between it or the post.
Imagine a magician saws your date in half in front of you. But then the guy next to you scoffs and says “there’s two girls and they squeeze into the boxes. Everyone knows this.” Well, do you? You don’t have to choose between answers when prompted
Comments