I think what she meant was a lawyer could make a colorable ("solid") argument that at least tries to use law. It wouldn't be good, but it would be more fruit of the poison tree than the poison tree itself. Elsewhere she says this EO is the most obvious animus you could imagine (the poison tree).
Comments
Most are of the general arguments also include trans people.
I’m 65 with bad knees, diabetes, A-Fib and I’m transgender. The first 4 facts exclude me from serving, not the fact I’m transgender.
Now, follow it up and seal the deal.
Talking points and sound bites are worthless; we need unflinching justice.
“If you can’t articulate what radical gender ideology means, how is the defense secretary going to know what it means?”
Lynch said he is “loathe to speculate” what Trump meant.
“It’s not like I randomly picked you off the street. You’re the government’s representative here.”