I would just like to underline what you said here and why it is internally contradictory:
You say you think transness needs a medical basis.
You also say you believe it does have a medical basis.
But what if there isn't one. If it is deemed necessary, how will you accept any result to the contrary?
You say you think transness needs a medical basis.
You also say you believe it does have a medical basis.
But what if there isn't one. If it is deemed necessary, how will you accept any result to the contrary?
Comments
Transness is not a settled matter in medical science and arguing based on assuming we know the answers is unscientific.