1/ The GOP-controlled NC Court of Appeals has issued a ruling clearing a path for GOP challenger Jefferson Griffin to overturn the 734-vote victory of Dem. Justice Allision Riggs–a case we’ve been following closely here @propublica.org
https://www.propublica.org/article/north-carolina-supreme-court-election-certification-blocked
https://www.propublica.org/article/north-carolina-supreme-court-election-certification-blocked
Comments
https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=44509
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/election/article296693744.html
https://www.propublica.org/article/jefferson-griffin-military-absentee-votes-north-carolina-supreme-court
https://www.propublica.org/article/jefferson-griffin-north-carolina-supreme-court-challenge-election-integrity-network
https://www.propublica.org/article/north-carolina-voters-jefferson-griffin-supreme-court-challenge
https://x.com/AllisonJRiggs/status/1908227717566234706
Why can’t the headline just unconditionally state the obvious fact that this is indeed dangerous for democracy?
Are courts allowed to set a cure process that cannot work?
Side note: Guess what new title I can now add to my resume?
(Spoiler: It appears to be "activist.")
#RuleOfLaw #Crisis