Hot take (maybe) but there should be a time limit on VAR checks. If it takes more than 60 seconds then it goes to on field decision. - ThreadSky

poorlydrawnarsenal.com • 28 days ago

Hot take (maybe) but there should be a time limit on VAR checks. If it takes more than 60 seconds then it goes to on field decision.

Comments

johankk.bsky.social•28 days ago

I agree. And I would even go so far as to say that if you need to use slow motion just go with the on field decision.

teetemz.bsky.social•28 days ago

I agree

grocanon.bsky.social•28 days ago

No.

gunnergalla.bsky.social•28 days ago

I have said this a lot. If it's taking this long by definition is not clear and obvious.

petergasston.co.uk•28 days ago

I just posted the same thing.
https://bsky.app/profile/petergasston.co.uk/post/3ljld22pfkk2q

mburs.bsky.social•28 days ago

If you have to do some CSI enhance.... Enhance... Enhance..... type shit then it ain't clear and obvious. Even for offside, if you can't look at three pictures and determine if it's off, then there's clearly not really an advantage.
That assumes ofc that all the cameras are working, which, y'know.

kaleenc.bsky.social•28 days ago

Agree! This would maybe force refs to ref instead of “falling back” on VAR, too.

goonlemon.bsky.social•28 days ago

Don't really understand what there looking at. Seems like it's pretty obvious he isn't involved

wazakun.bsky.social•28 days ago

When will I get to make my tea then? No way. I need my tea breaks.

baconear.bsky.social•28 days ago

I've been saying this for ages. But make it 30 seconds

jimt1970.bsky.social•28 days ago

Yep - totally agree

dohertym.bsky.social•28 days ago

Said this yesterday, thought 2 mins is more than enough to decide if it is clear and obvious.

luknjac.bsky.social•28 days ago

As much as I enjoy watching our captain have a nice chat with the referee while we have no idea what they're checking instead of watching, you know, some football, I agree.