ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
kdevarakonda.bsky.social
•
48 days ago
What do we think about R01s that have four Specific Aims? #neuroscience #academicsky 🧪
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
andrewhardaway.bsky.social
•
48 days ago
less is more
1
1
reply
[–]
kdevarakonda.bsky.social
•
48 days ago
Ah, but splitting this project's aims into 4 makes each aim simpler rather than a Franken-Aim 1 that combines two different ideas
1
1
reply
[–]
andrewhardaway.bsky.social
•
48 days ago
That'd probably be fine. Accessibility is everything. I just rarely see 4 aims.
1
reply
[–]
chiasm.bsky.social
•
48 days ago
It's a five year grant, right? There's nothing magic about 3, 4, 2 with multiple sub aims, etc.
2
1
reply
[–]
kdevarakonda.bsky.social
•
48 days ago
In theory! But that doesn't stop reviewers from having opinions, lol
1
1
reply
[–]
chiasm.bsky.social
•
48 days ago
I've never understood the mantra "you must have three aims. The number of aims you propose must be three." --seems like magical thinking to me! 😂 Not very scientific...
0
reply
[–]
irosso.bsky.social
•
47 days ago
I have had a 4-aim R01 funded. Avoiding a"Franken-aim", as you said, may be wise and appropriate.
1
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments