Gradually but inexorably, the WSJ editorial page is coming to terms with the fact that leader of their preferred political party is, ah, well, a bit of a grifter.
Free link
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/air-force-one-qatar-gift-donald-trump-boeing-747-c80b7e01?st=8Vr7SE&reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink
Free link
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/air-force-one-qatar-gift-donald-trump-boeing-747-c80b7e01?st=8Vr7SE&reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink
Comments
"A legal morass" it is not. It's simply illegal. The supreme law of the land says so. There's no ambiguity, no question, no "morass". It's exactly the thing the Founders said DO NOT ALLOW.
Perhaps the WSJ can call a spade a spade some time.
Not "maybe so", but DEFINITELY NO. Read the Constitution, WSJ. Nothing about "contingent on any official action"....
The GOP Congress is in on the grift.
Where are the cops on the beat?
Draw up plans for post Trump prosecutions.
make the cost clear to them.
Maybe we need to form some think tanks and come up with a reason to revoke the First Amendment protection of members of the press who constantly endanger the security of our nation? I certainly can pull theories out of my ass anytime
Too late....
🙄
Yeah?
WSJ editors finally notice their golden calf’s a con artist. But hey, why lead a country when you can lease it? #ArtOfTheSteal #BoeingBonuses