To them as an individual. The claim is based on direct discrimination and Article 9. If we were claiming indirect discrimination we would be looking at the impact on a group - see Eweida v British Airways & Eweida v UK in ECHR
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
By my reading the questions for the Court were primarily indirect discrimination (1st Q was only indirect - para 31 and 2nd Q was direct and indirect - para 40). Interesting to see that Belgian law provides a justification defence for religious and sexual orientation discrim as well as age.
Comments