Bullshit graph.
If the "Representative UK resident" is an average, it's clearly lower than the average of migrant criterias 🤦🏾♂️ meaning migrants are better for the NHS.
Also:
- Period of time?
- Percentage of age?
- Where is worker spending? (VAT)
This type of graph was designed to mislead.
If the "Representative UK resident" is an average, it's clearly lower than the average of migrant criterias 🤦🏾♂️ meaning migrants are better for the NHS.
Also:
- Period of time?
- Percentage of age?
- Where is worker spending? (VAT)
This type of graph was designed to mislead.
Reposted from
Iain Mansfield
1. Your graph excludes the impact of dependents, which is large.
2. Comparing averages is irrelevant. Many EU and non-EU migrants are low-skilled and a fiscal drain.
Simply not admitting these - which is totally in our power to do - would improve GDP per capita and the fiscal situation.
2. Comparing averages is irrelevant. Many EU and non-EU migrants are low-skilled and a fiscal drain.
Simply not admitting these - which is totally in our power to do - would improve GDP per capita and the fiscal situation.
Comments