This DOJ brief refers to an "Acting U.S. Digital Service Administrator" and acknowledges "the U.S. Digital Service, redesignated as the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency Service" but doesn't give a name of the official, unlike other officials in the same paragraph. https://bsky.app/profile/sarahposner.bsky.social/post/3liksi3lesk2s
yes because in court the Trump administration is saying that Musk isn't in charge of DOGE. according to them he bares no responsibility for anything done that has been done by the DOGE people
I am
Iam
I am
I am
I am
Iam
I am
Ia am
I am i
I am the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
Iam the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
Easy. DOGE is a department that is not a department that has an administrator who is not an administator. It is helmed by no leader but is led by a leader who leads it to determine what services and individuals are essential-- or not. While specific cuts may occur, no one specific was involved.
I think what I like most about all of this... is that the blustering and lies they say from the podiums gets absolutely decimated in a court of law... this will be no exception... especially as they keep blasting nonsense from the podiums that contradict the legal filings.
Comments
No.
“…he’s a person who needs to be committed [for the suffering and death his decisions have caused in the past several weeks, and until he is stopped].”
No. Wait. That's who the New Girl is....
Iam
I am
I am
I am
Iam
I am
Ia am
I am i
I am the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
Iam the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
I am the administrator of doge
the Chief Administrator.
Which would be funnier if DOGE was not doing real damage to our country.
Fuck