Except that SCOTUS ruled last year that a president who breaks the law has immunity, if he does it as part of his official duties. Who determines whether that ruling is cogent and constitutional (SCOTUS, apparently)? And, when will that ruling be overturned?
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Comments