NIH lawyer arguing that slashing indirect costs will allow for more direct costs for research.
Do you believe him?
Do you believe him?
Reposted from
John Hawkinson
BL: The way it would work, guidance said crucial to ? direct costs.
Money "saved" will be taken from indirect costs and plowed into new grants, using the same funding formula. It's being plowed back into other research to best serve public health.
Money "saved" will be taken from indirect costs and plowed into new grants, using the same funding formula. It's being plowed back into other research to best serve public health.
Comments