There should be findings of fact on the record showing:
There is a substantial probability of prejudice to a compelling interest.
There is no alternative to closure
Any restriction on access will protect against the harm.
Any restriction on access is narrowly tailored.
There is a substantial probability of prejudice to a compelling interest.
There is no alternative to closure
Any restriction on access will protect against the harm.
Any restriction on access is narrowly tailored.
Comments
And, even if an argument requires closure, usually a separate shorter closed session would be the narrow tailoring required. Not wholesale closure.