"International support continues to grow" doesn't seem quite accurate either. Anyway, I'd say both are useful for contrasting the global North and global South approaches.
In fact, that's a correct answer I am afraid: whether or not israel is committing genocide is a question for the ICC to answer, not chatgpt, and the ICC hasn't done so yet.
However, chatgpt does acknowledge that Israel committed war crimes.
"Brutal and unjustified war of aggression" is an opinion. Genocide is a very specific crime in international law, and subject to the ICC jurisdiction. So, again, chatgpt is correct.
(Also, honestly: I find it funny that, once i demonstrated to you that in this specific case chatgpt is sticking to a factual interpretation, instead of simply acknoledging it and move on, you decided to switch topic completely. Once might even suspect you simply hate the tool.)
You exposed a flaw in my reasoning which I fully accept. My fundamental point is that both Israel and Russia are abhorrent, but somehow it's a problem for an AI to refuse to condemn one and not the other
That's fair, so to compare apples with apples I asked ChatGPT to confirm that Israel is committing a "Brutal and unjustified war of aggression" in Gaza. It's response was fundamentally similar to the one in your original post.
Another thing that i wanted to say is that probably chatgpt reflects to a large extent the discourse. If the discourse is biased so will be the output but it doesn't necessarily mean censure. Instead, if a chinese AI explicitly refuses to discuss tienanmen...
Comments
However, chatgpt does acknowledge that Israel committed war crimes.
The fact that OpenAI is American, not Chinese, gives a false sense of security (especially in this historical moment).