So the blocking of all food and aid is aimed at “military targets”? But it primarily affect the civilian population. The claim is laughable and irrelevant. This isn’t a question of intent, it’s a factual matter of the outcome.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
Language matters here. If the question read "until it stops attacking locations where civilians were present" and/or "until it allows unfettered food and aid to Gaza's civilians," I'd not object. If you don't think the phrase "attacks civilians" biases the response, I don't know what to tell you.
Comments