Anyone reading the Cass Review should be able to see it was political, with a set end point dictated in advance. It was criticised at the time by scientists for this. Every other country’s reviews on gender affirming care has found puberty blockers are safe. Cass’ report should be binned. - ThreadSky

bloomeroid.bsky.social • 72 days ago

Anyone reading the Cass Review should be able to see it was political, with a set end point dictated in advance. It was criticised at the time by scientists for this. Every other country’s reviews on gender affirming care has found puberty blockers are safe. Cass’ report should be binned.

Reposted from The Science Of Trans Sports!

An independent (2024) review commissioned by the NSW government into gender-affirming care for children has found that Puberty blockers a 'safe, effective and reversible' form of gender-affirming care.

www.saxinstitute.org.au/wp-content/u...

Comments

adderallbulbasaur.bsky.social•71 days ago

Totally agreee. Also, perhaps we need to stop calling it the "Cass Review" and exclusively refer to it as the "Cass Scandal" or "Cass Sham".

pomeraniangod.bsky.social•71 days ago

I like this idea.

katekilla.bsky.social•71 days ago

I hope that it will be binned and stay binned -- unfortunately, I fear it'll be like the Wakefield paper, which was obviously bullshit and professionally denounced and has still had ruinous and ongoing effects.

monarchlou.bsky.social•71 days ago

It's propaganda to say it causes sterilization and osteoporosis.

lizcious.bsky.social•71 days ago

God it is so discouraging to see the uncritical support Cass seems to have received all over. It's like people were just waiting for an excuse to turn on us.

(Yes I recognize and appreciate those who have tried to push back on it, unfortunately they haven't been very effective...)

andrewstan94.bsky.social•71 days ago

Should be shredded and burnt mate. They are playing politics with people's lives and pandering to a few transphobes.

deadlyflowers.bsky.social•71 days ago

📌

dickeyx2.bsky.social•71 days ago

📌

chester66red.bsky.social•71 days ago

She chose to endorse the torture and abuse of LGBTQ+ plus the transphobia from the start, that was the conclusion she wanted to reach before she started, how the help can anyone think she’s credible?

kirstimiller30.bsky.social•72 days ago

Dr Allan disagrees with CASS as she advocates doing nothing is doing no harm.

Dr Allan said

"There's quite a lot of risks in not giving that person opportunity to express themselves and find some way that they can move forward.”

Doing nothing is doing something!

https://amp.abc.net.au/article/104114718

bloomeroid.bsky.social•71 days ago

It’s a bit like saying, “cancer drugs can cause serious harm, better not give them to people with cancer”.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply