Science would disagree with you. Kindly identify a SINGLE man who 'transitioned' to a woman who became a healthy, whole female, i.e., capable of bearing children? There are none. 'Transitioning' produces sterile, i.e., defective, individuals. Your ideology clearly clouds your reason.
You just have a limited understanding of science. Along with an ideologically skewed view of who trans people are. There are of course plenty of trans men who have borne children, who are happy, whole and healthy men. So "ideology clouds your reason" is an argument that cuts both ways.
No, I don't. Science is about FACTS and what it is to KNOW a thing. People with gender dysphoria are mentally ill. Genital mutilation cannot make a female out of a male any more than language mutilation can make sense out of nonsense. "Trans" men are women, which is why they can bear children. Duh.
So, do you want to go down a dick measuring contest when I ask you if you have as many science qualifications as I do? Or would you prefer me to remind you of the anti-gay rhetoric of "it's not natural" which is disproved by actual facts also?
There is nothing 'anti-gay (whatever the hell that means)' about stating facts. And facts don't care about your feelings. Don't characterize deformities as normative.
I'm referring to a different argument that has similarities to the anti-trans lines you are taking. I notice that you aren't trying to take me up on whether or not you are more qualified than me to pretend you know about science. But trans people are real, and medical science knows about them.
Comments