Right, you can argue that in a particular case the amount of process due is ‘essentially none’. That’s honestly a more defensible position than ‘you don’t get due process’, which amounts to saying ‘we agree there is a process due to you that we should follow here, but we don’t want to’.
Right, and we know that at a minimum it requires that anyone subject to any kind of deprivation by the state must have at least some opportunity to contest the lawfulness thereof
Comments