Socialists, 2020: Keir Starmer is a cunt Socialists, 2021: Keir Starmer is a cunt Socialists, 2022: Keir Starmer is a cunt Socialists, 2023: Keir Starmer is a cunt Socialists, 2024: Keir Starmer is a cunt Everyone else, 2025: Wait… Keir Starmer is a cunt, isn’t he? - ThreadSky

michaeleastwriter.bsky.social • 3 days ago

Socialists, 2020: Keir Starmer is a cunt

Socialists, 2021: Keir Starmer is a cunt

Socialists, 2022: Keir Starmer is a cunt

Socialists, 2023: Keir Starmer is a cunt

Socialists, 2024: Keir Starmer is a cunt

Everyone else, 2025: Wait… Keir Starmer is a cunt, isn’t he?

Comments

gearpunkv.bsky.social•2 days ago

Trust the science.

mattcolbeck.bsky.social•3 days ago

The Road to Damascunt.

alisonrossiter.bsky.social•3 days ago

We all saw the cunt coming, anyone who claims they didn't is in fact also a cunt.

moanknight.bsky.social•3 days ago

This

coupland73.bsky.social•3 days ago

But did you know his dad was a tool maker!

jim1993.bsky.social•3 days ago

So let me be clear starmer is still a see you next tuesday

Got ya

So true comrade

cliffchapman.bsky.social•3 days ago

Socialists also failed to provide an effective alternative, so the options socialists provided were:

A stupid old man who was useless at everything, who the vast majority of the population hated

Or The Tories again, because complaining & protesting were more interesting than winning & governing

blahdyblah.bsky.social•2 days ago

That's cool, so glad the "centrists" stepped up and provided us with....this. After sabotaging their own party for daring offer a centre left option. Own it, you are a social murderer. Tory scum.

cliffchapman.bsky.social•2 days ago

You want change? Put up a candidate that does more than preach to the converted, that isn't electoral Kryptonite, that actually has an ounce of strategy to manage media and people who aren't natural voters for them. Until then, own being absolutely fucking useless at pitching and winning elections.

cliffchapman.bsky.social•2 days ago

What does that solve? I voted Labour because if I didn't vote Labour I simply wouldn't have voted and thus let in Tories or Reform en masse if everyone did as I did because that's the default. Or the Greens who did fuck all. Or the Lib Dems who are either Tory enablers or charmingly useless.

justified72.bsky.social•2 days ago

Your bio states (correctly) that trans rights are human rights, and you are pro-Rejoin... Yet you dismiss The Liberal Democrats as "Tory enablers."

The Liberal Democrats (unlike the Tories *and* Labour) are steadfastly pro-trans rights and pro-Rejoin.

cliffchapman.bsky.social•2 days ago

Yes they are. But this may shock you, two policies I stand by do not a successful political party necessarily make. I have time for them, I think the 72 seats is an incredible achievement coming back from the Coalition and far more should be made of that than Reform.

cliffchapman.bsky.social•2 days ago

But the vote-splitting of the 80s and 1992, and various other issues mean they were never in contention for actual government. I'm sorry their numbers don't beat the Tories, I'd like to see that. But they tend to be the "I would vote Tory but can't vote Tory" for people who see through Reform...

cliffchapman.bsky.social•2 days ago

Everyone had a choice of two parties at the last election to form a govt and I voted for the party that wasn't the one that had made a hamfisted pigs ear out of the last fourteen years. You didn't vote? What the fuck good did that do? You voted for a fringe party? What the fuck did that do?

rmurdoch.bsky.social•1 day ago

And when Centrist Starmer doesn't meaningfully reduce the inequality gap we likely get Farage and his ilk.

jmspikeguy.bsky.social•2 days ago

It’s really looking that way from my perspective

seanfl50.bsky.social•22 hours ago

Keir Starmer is just a Tory masquerading as a Labourite, like Tony Blair before him. Like the Tories, Starmer seeks to systematically exterminate the poor and disabled through arbitrary cuts to the welfare state.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply