2 One pro-migrant participant, Mathilda, calls her group critics privileged. True, compared with most people in Somalia and Syria. But GBTWYCF could have laced the series with salient data. Like migrants' value in the NHS and other vital British sectors.
6 Numerous senior citizens remain in hospital beds, well, but unable to leave without social care. Many in residential home must sell their homes to fund care.
Streeting has delayed reform for three years.
5 Older people in numerous cases question migration increases. The UK state pension lags behind similar wealthy countries.The elderly are more likely to use a failing NHS than other age groups.
4 Large numbers against migrant levels come from the working class. Many say how the education system, under aĺl the parties, has failed them. White working class pupils gain the lowest grades at GCSE from any main ethnic group. Just a quarter of boys and a third of girls obtain five good GCSEs.
3 The UK upholds most asylum seekers' claims. Its population will grow by 5m in a decade. Yet Labour's government vows to build just 1.5m homes in five years. One in five white Britons live in poverty. People of Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnicity have poverty rates of at least twice as high.
1 From a refugee family, I advocate rhe best hope for asylum seekers and economic migrants. Not only enough pressure on UK ministers to help them. To ensure living standards and public services match population growth. So far, Go Back to Where You Came From ducks the link.
Those criticising the format of the programme should be reminded of the dramatisation of the Post Office Scandal and how that galvanised the government into action. Documentaries never achieved that. Maybe an asylum seeker storyline on one of the soaps should follow!
So it starts of with anti immigration folk that experience life in a war torn country and then they trek back to the UK, with their outlook on immigration changed?
Comments
Streeting has delayed reform for three years.
Am I understanding the article correctly?