Preprint on using SEM fit indices & conventional cutoffs in confirmatory network analysis updated! Now with a Shiny app for results display.
PsyArXiv: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/d76ab_v2
RG: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382294290_Moving_from_exploratory_to_confirmatory_network_analysis_An_evaluation_of_SEM_fit_indices_and_cutoff_values_in_network_psychometrics
Shiny app: https://github.com/xinkaidupsy/cna_fit_app
See 🧵 for the summary of results
PsyArXiv: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/d76ab_v2
RG: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382294290_Moving_from_exploratory_to_confirmatory_network_analysis_An_evaluation_of_SEM_fit_indices_and_cutoff_values_in_network_psychometrics
Shiny app: https://github.com/xinkaidupsy/cna_fit_app
See 🧵 for the summary of results
Comments
3. Conventional cutoffs were convenient assessment criteria and generally performed well, albeit stricter cutoffs might be needed for hypothesis testing and replication studies