In a really limited amount of contexts, and too unreliable for most critical applications except in close partnership with the humans it was supposed to replace.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I don't really understand your grammar here, so I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say. But if you think there's any threat of skynet in the foreseeable future, LOL NO. That's actually hype, baby. And misdirection. Pay attention to what the humans want to do. Technology is a tool.
Also, you DO realise that nuclear energy necessarily involves developing the technology and expertise and political environment that makes it very very easy to go on to concentrate and deploy the necessary plutonium isotopes for nuclear weapons?
Yes, but there is alternative nuclear power using thorium, which is plentiful as the sand on the shores. There is no way to make a weapon. It is low pressure, so there is no risk of explosion. NASA used it on spacecraft sent into deep space.
"Uranium-233 has a lower critical mass, which means that less material can be used to build a weapon. And compared with weapons-grade plutonium-239, uranium-233 has a much lower spontaneous fission rate, enabling simpler weapons that are more easily constructed."
THORIUM? You'd still need to develop the technology to enrich uranium or plutonium as well for that, and that's aside from the fact that it's still yet to properly be road-tested and has got quite the economics and disposal problems of its own. Lmfao where do you get your info from
Well, AI researchers such as Google reported in researching AI by having it play games to win would cheat in novel ways the researchers did not think of. Also, when language research was ongoing, the AI noticed they were being observed and developed a language no one could understand.
What? Lmao are you talking about the 2017 facebook bots? Stop anthropomorphising so breathlessly, though to be fair, a lot of tech journalism is very ignorant and sensationalist. No, the bots didn't try to evade humans. And yes, in playing games, you will come up with novel recombinations. So?
Comments
Also, you DO realise that nuclear energy necessarily involves developing the technology and expertise and political environment that makes it very very easy to go on to concentrate and deploy the necessary plutonium isotopes for nuclear weapons?
"Uranium-233 has a lower critical mass, which means that less material can be used to build a weapon. And compared with weapons-grade plutonium-239, uranium-233 has a much lower spontaneous fission rate, enabling simpler weapons that are more easily constructed."
#Thorium