"We must recognize the harms that will result when writing is primarily treated as a tool to transcribe answers, including its implications for critical thinking, democratic decision-making, and linguistic variation and expression.” 🔥 refusinggenai.wordpress.com (1/5) - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

jenaecohn.bsky.social • 56 days ago

"We must recognize the harms that will result when writing is primarily treated as a tool to transcribe answers, including its implications for critical thinking, democratic decision-making, and linguistic variation and expression.” 🔥

https://refusinggenai.wordpress.com/

(1/5)

Comments

jenaecohn.bsky.social•56 days ago

This fire rhetoric courtesy of @rcmeg.bsky.social, Jennifer Sano-Franchini, and Maggie Fernandes. Anyone who thinks about writing instruction (whether you're in the field of writing studies or not) should absolutely read this! This essay had me thinking of several follow-up questions... (2/5)

jenaecohn.bsky.social•56 days ago

1. What does it look like to shift perspectives on writing across the curriculum to help educators of all disciplines recognize what it means to design writing assignments that go beyond "the transactional?" (3/5)

jenaecohn.bsky.social•56 days ago

2. How do we discourage the surveillance logic inherent in requiring proof of seeing drafts? (e.g. I'm noticing that many instructors are asking for proof of drafting in the form of submitting evidence of writing logs and revisions in Google Docs, which is fairly invasive!) (4/5)

jenaecohn.bsky.social•56 days ago

3. What does it look like to resist the linguistic homogenization that LLM usage may reinforce? (5/5)

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply