having read this weirdly boosterish piece and played with Claude too, I can tell you exactly what Claude is doing that makes it feel 'warmer' & more human. it unilaterally asks you abt things you mentioned earlier in the chat. which makes it sound as if it's thinking
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/13/technology/claude-ai-anthropic.html?unlocked_article_code=1.hE4.O5jt.BdCSoBXZCDLQ&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/13/technology/claude-ai-anthropic.html?unlocked_article_code=1.hE4.O5jt.BdCSoBXZCDLQ&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
Comments
(yes, the joke is that I sound like a knob)
The words, styles, tones, grammar, and formatting they use are important to users and the public perception of the models
Check out Ted Giola on substack for interesting writing on the subject, interspersed with jazz.
Behold, the very first thing it said to me, from a very straightforward, not bait question:
I don’t understand why novelists can spot this and journalists can’t, but I do note the trend.
I’m an engineer so I may be missing something obvious.
But a lot of basic journalism (especially clickbait) is just summarising stuff or rewriting something with a standard angle, and 'AI' is already very good at that.
But note his quoted sources!
For clarity, I’m sure this wasn’t lost on you.
So basically it does Eliza's trick from the late 1960s? (Yes, I'm sure it does more, but yeesh.)