This is going to be a difficult nut to crack… what’s being suggested is catering to their lowest impulses… that’s what Rogan Peterson and Tate do
Reposted from
Raywat Deonandan
If progressives want to win back young men, then they must talk to them and address their needs, instead of constant scolding. All the finger wagging just drives them to Rogan, Peterson, and the Tate brothers. And they DO talk to young men.
Comments
It’s not because they appeal to their greater humanity
It’s because they appeal to their lowest depravity
“I don’t wanna ___”
Rewarded by permissive daddy
“You don’t have to”
And they don’t understand the distinction
It conveniently leaves out… “for what”
Regardless of what or how we perceive/think of them, they feel a certain type of way. Somewhere along the way someone (society? School? Parents?) made them feel their only worth is their terrible impulses.
We got here because we stopped having consequences.
People hate consequences being painful in any way but humans learned to stop touching fire because they got burnt. More people need to get burned.
Catering to them more will just breed more of them wanting to be catered to.
I say, hold the line.
a Dragonball will always outsell a Vinland Saga
I do agree its a cultural/ patriarchy issue, but you'll be hard pressed to get them to change in groups due to Bravado and pressure
So we have a large number of young men and boys self harming and joining radical/cult beliefs.
They need therapy cause whatever is happening at home, online, in their community or in school isn't helping.
Men don't attempt suicide much more often than women, but they succeed much more frequently because they are more likely to use guns.
I am not defending older men like if they are 30+ (being generous) still on that misogny shit fuck them.
I am talking like young. the stat i am refering to is age 15-19 specifically. We (Men) on this side need to reach out to them.
https://bsky.app/profile/cait.bsky.social/post/3ljv5pk5wws2s