"Nearly 100 former national security officials signed a letter criticizing President-elect Donald Trump's decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence and called for closed-door Senate hearings to review any government information about her." - ThreadSky

justinhendrix.bsky.social • 85 days ago

"Nearly 100 former national security officials signed a letter criticizing President-elect Donald Trump's decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence and called for closed-door Senate hearings to review any government information about her."

Comments

marguerite00.bsky.social•85 days ago

She is completely inappropriate. No hearings needed. Her nomination should be a hard "NO" period.

fisherdanar.bsky.social•85 days ago

Does anyone think these letters do anything? I’m asking in good faith to hear others’ opinions, not to be snarky, since ai haven’t seen them move any needle politically

bassoonysu.bsky.social•85 days ago

Yeah, I agree that they are not very helpful when they come from people who no longer work in the intelligence community and thus have limited influence. A letter from senators raising concerns to other senators would be much more effective.

marcadimartino.bsky.social•85 days ago

She should get Hegsethed pronto.

willsonc.bsky.social•85 days ago

And eleventy billion national security staff signed a letter that trump is a national security risk. No one cared about that and u think this will keep gop from bending the knee? They dgaf

yojimbo1212.bsky.social•85 days ago

Her ride in the barrel is coming. We all need to make sure it rolls hard and fast.

allanschlosser.bsky.social•85 days ago

At best a "useful idiot" and at worst a textbook Russian asset, Gabbard both totally unqualified and a threat to the security of the U.S., our Five Eyes partners, and our allies generally.

sheepstealers.bsky.social•85 days ago

Satan recalls on of his demons, GOP mourns:

rtoit.bsky.social•85 days ago

Republican Senators won't care. Their sycophancy towards Trump is eternal.

recursiverealms.com•84 days ago

too little too late

saneamerican.bsky.social•84 days ago

Gaetz is gone, Hegseth teetering, now is the time for the media to concentrate its investigative reporting on Gabbard as the national security risk she poses is incalculable.

grouchysmurf.bsky.social•84 days ago

At this point I think we all recognize this country is in deep doodoo. Other countries have already signaled their reluctance to share intel with us, and rightly so. Who would want to share intel with a man who keeps top secret docs in his bathroom and has an admin full of clowns? Scary times folks.

northsleuth.bsky.social•85 days ago

MAGA Response: What do they know?

bd-sint.bsky.social•85 days ago

If she gets to a nomination hearing, it's going to be ugly.

mriley159.bsky.social•83 days ago

I am so upset that i shall pen a letter! I shall start it with, "To whom it may concern..." Mother, where is my pen?

progressivegop.bsky.social•85 days ago

Of course, that's just going to make Trump want her more.

And let's not forget, she IS the preferred nominee of his handler (Putin), so he'll have to try and push her through no matter what.

capt-chris.bsky.social•85 days ago

What a shitshow … a Russian troll at the apex of US Intelligence.

bd-sint.bsky.social•85 days ago

Don't forget about the commander-in-chief!

sospike.bsky.social•85 days ago

Why don’t they expose her publicly?

therealkeninmn.bsky.social•85 days ago

None of Trumps picks for high government positions make any sense until one accepts the fact that the entire point is to destroy our government from the inside, and then use that as justification for a complete authoritarian takeover...

drstevenquest.bsky.social•85 days ago

This is important, but America just elected an even greater national security threat.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply