While I am extremely happy for all the ways NVIDIA is accelerating the robot learning processes, I don’t understand this need to constantly renew the nomenclature for vanilla concepts of modeling and control theory.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/glossary/generative-physical-ai/?ncid=so-nvsh-183319-vt48&source=everyonesocial&network=linkedin&userID=f59c2fd4-f03a-47d8-8281-1299ddde4fd8&es_id=ea962a435b
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/glossary/generative-physical-ai/?ncid=so-nvsh-183319-vt48&source=everyonesocial&network=linkedin&userID=f59c2fd4-f03a-47d8-8281-1299ddde4fd8&es_id=ea962a435b
Comments
You either live long enough to be rebranded an AI researcher, or you die a death as a "classical method".
Especially when academic funding flows in the direction of “hype”-cycles, everyone got to rebrand themselves as the pioneers of the next-big-thing.