“(…) If these emails contain non-public personal details (e.g., unredacted names, addresses, or internal deliberations), they could be considered private under X’s doxxing policy, even if they’re government-related. (…)”
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
“(…) In conclusion, government emails aren’t inherently private—they’re often public records subject to disclosure under U.S. law. However, they can contain private information (e.g., personal data or internal deliberations) that X’s doxxing policy protects.
“In Caraballo’s case, posting “DOGE emails” likely exposed such private elements, leading to permanent suspension on March 8, 2025. The line depends on whether the emails were already public, properly redacted, or consented to—X’s judgment seems to have favored privacy over transparency.” By grok.
Comments