One thing is certain, Ukraine cannot afford a diplomatic fight. This makes me start to favor the idea raised by one of my followers that Zelensky should consider resigning. I repeat the idea; Finnish President Risto Ryti (wartime president)
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
resigned himself and called on the parliament to appoint Mannerheim as the new president. In our case, it should be General Valery Zaluznyj, because it is undoubtedly Great Britain that must assume European
responsibility, Zaluznyj would be ideal. He has the trust of the people and now serves as ambassador in London, which means daily contact with the government in Britain.
Zelensky was a very good president in the first two years of the war,E
thanks to him we got the help we needed. Now we are coping militarily with the ryzz, so now it turns to a diplomatic solution, and unfortunately the current administration is not able to bear this responsibility.
Regardless of your opinion, the US plays a crucial role in the development, the US is the only superpower in the world. Zelensky burned the bridge to Trump because Trump takes everything personally. For serious peace talks it is probably necessary for
the Zelensky administration to step aside, this should happen while we can choose the successor ourselves. If forced to do so, both Trump and the Kremlin have a finger in the pie.
At Kupyansk, Ryzz tried a massive attack with armored vehicles. They were wiped out before they even got to our lines. The only place they are advancing now is in Burlatske, Zaporizhzhia. It's open ground, they're taking too many casualties.
I thought that it was either accidentally or intentionally well played by both Zelensky and Trump because this was in the end an effective plot to wake up Europeans to invest in European defence.
Comments
Zelensky was a very good president in the first two years of the war,E
Finally, a bit about the fronts.
I've said before