It’s probably the feel of heavy manipulation in the image. The limited depth of field looks artificial, as does the human-like expression on the animal. Thanks to the other poster to the Insta source. All of that person’s work feels heavily contrived to me. Not my taste, I guess.
So, because the image is generated from that noise, you also don't have a concrete light source. This image, does. It is mostly bright. AI, generally, does not does that.
That being said, I agree that it looks altered. The smile is what looks it for me. Everything else may well be real.
Its aound the mouth, like I said before, there's a square. It just looks like a little digital distortion in a clear square. That's not AI work. Human done. Anyway, that's all I saw at a glance. Hope that helps!
It seems you don't know the difference between AI and photoshop. And that's ok. Let me give you soem tips:
If it was AI, (which to my belief it is not) the best way to tell is if the shading and lighting was off. AI makes images from noise dark and light. It comes out evenly, looks unnatural
(1/1)
Comments
That being said, I agree that it looks altered. The smile is what looks it for me. Everything else may well be real.
2/2
If it was AI, (which to my belief it is not) the best way to tell is if the shading and lighting was off. AI makes images from noise dark and light. It comes out evenly, looks unnatural
(1/1)
Check out his Instagram @julianradwildlife