ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
esghound.com
•
6 days ago
If I were designing a moon lander I would make sure it doesn't tip over every time, maybe they should have thought of that
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
objectiveunlocked.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
https://youtu.be/3m5qxZm_JqM?si=VK4xHl8jEQ3_ngC5
1
reply
[–]
whrwlfthrwlf85v.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
And make damn sure that it can fit at least 4 Marines on it.
1
reply
[–]
fermispairofsocks.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
They just didn't play enough Lunar Lander as kids.
2
reply
[–]
antidr.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
I don't get why they don't use Soviet LK-style upside down braking thrusters for stability at touchdown if they insist on a tall lander lol
0
reply
[–]
amescoestate.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
Do you build rockets Eric? Maybe leave it to the big brain genius here /s
1
reply
[–]
hightokolob.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
I learned from IM-1 that just touching the moon counts as a success, apparently.
1
reply
[–]
brodiefriesen.xyz
•
6 days ago
Maybe the front fell off
2
reply
[–]
coverdrive12.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
Apollo engineers shared the same opinion.
1
reply
[–]
petebrooksbank.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
I see Eric Berger's got his snipe in nice and early. Next it'll be "why do we need this lander when Starship definitely won't tip over?"
6
2
reply
[–]
oh-that-amy.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
the space nazis want us to quit being mean to eric
4
reply
[–]
oh-that-amy.bsky.social
•
6 days ago
or heck "why do we need this lander when starship will definitely reach the moon ever?"
2
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments