Another day, another review written by chatGPT. This is very quickly undermining the complete scientific endeavour.

As an aside: do LLMs generally produce positive reviews, even if presented with clear nonsense?
Reposted from Josie Bryant
Frustrating - I reviewed a paper that was highly problematic, mainly in scientific rigour undermining most of the conclusions, so I recommend Reject. However the editor decides to Revise presumably due to the more positive comments from reviewer 2... /1

Comments