The Delaware Court of Chancery issued its latest opinion the Musk pay saga.
Specifically, the Court rejected Musk’s argument that the stockholder vote “ratifying” his pay package was sufficient to overturn the Court’s earlier opinion ordering rescission. 1/
https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=372420
Specifically, the Court rejected Musk’s argument that the stockholder vote “ratifying” his pay package was sufficient to overturn the Court’s earlier opinion ordering rescission. 1/
https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=372420
Comments
First, this opinion also addresses the fee request from plaintiff’s counsel. The lawyers asked for $5.6 billion. The Court granted them $345 million.
Second, the opinion is very long because it contains multiple independent reasons why Musk lost. 2/
Clients come first! 3/
First - some background. This is a case where a stockholder sued the Tesla board for breach of fiduciary duty regarding the $55.8 billion compensation package that they granted to Elon Musk. The comp plan was stock-based. /4
https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=359340
Now, a brief sidebar: As a general rule (some exceptions apply, please don't @ me) there are three levels of scrutiny in DE. /7