Been starting to edit this old JPG (raw lost forever). from left to right (Bill Evans joke!): jpg-from-raw, slight edit, more edit. Can't do a poll on bluesky but feedback is appreciated. i have no idea what im doing. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

4melwave.bsky.social • 96 days ago

Been starting to edit this old JPG (raw lost forever).
from left to right (Bill Evans joke!):
jpg-from-raw, slight edit, more edit. Can't do a poll on bluesky but feedback is appreciated. i have no idea what im doing.

Comments

burnttoaster44.bsky.social•96 days ago

nilin1017.bsky.social•96 days ago

I agree that C looks the best

4melwave.bsky.social•96 days ago

yep! but i am a bit worried, because blowing up saturation to make the colors is fun, i don't know if it'd be considered amateurish. I do like the look, regardless, so i suppose it doesn't matter.

powflip.bsky.social•96 days ago

I like C the most. Like the seeing the subtleties of the rendering of the latex on the legs!

4melwave.bsky.social•96 days ago

Thanks! I largely agree. It's worth mentioning that my skin was unintentionally altered in C, and I like the way it's lit more in B.

The primary goal was indeed to get the gloss shine visible on the white socks; i'm glad that data wasn't obliterated even in the JPG.

toasty236p.bsky.social•96 days ago

i think the richness of the blue in C is super nice!

blissymichelle.bsky.social•95 days ago

For C, the colors really pop so much better, and the reflections are very clear
For B, the white seems to fade into a solid thing without texture or depth

lookofthesound.bsky.social•96 days ago

feel like yhe colors pop a bit better on C

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply