Regardless of whether you think it’s in or not (and I’m almost certain it’s in)
The rules are that VAR interventions that don’t call the on-field ref to the screen have to be for 100% factual calls
VAR should never be making judgement calls on anything that isn’t cast-iron
Really, really poor
The rules are that VAR interventions that don’t call the on-field ref to the screen have to be for 100% factual calls
VAR should never be making judgement calls on anything that isn’t cast-iron
Really, really poor
Comments
It's the only way the huns can get near us.
Reminds me of Jota's goal at Fir Park they chopped for offside. They admitted they were using the wrong camera then compounded their lies by rewriting the offside law. But only for that incident. 🍀
If linesman had called it out at the time, would have been fine with the decision
But to be overturned is a bit mad. No way the VAR could tell 100% one way or the other
Leave it to the linesman/on-field refs
There’s no way a view up in the stand and level with the 18-yard-line will ever be able to tell conclusively
It just confuses things adding another ref’s opinion
When the whole ball is over, it usually looks a mile over the line
It’s actually a moot point anyway mate
The actual linesman didn’t think it was out in real time
And because the VAR can’t prove categorically that it was out, it shouldn’t have been ruled out
That was my point. No conspiracy. Just poor officiating 👍
It was obvious to me during real time.
ahow some OBJECTIVE factual data that shows the ball was out
that's the rules
My opinion is it was out. You disagree. Get your big Bhoy pants on and sook it up
if VAR intervenes, it needs to be factual
show me the factual evidence var used
it doesn't exist
becase Scottish var is shit, the angle was from 18 yard line
https://youtu.be/OqBl6lCIIoU?si=cGQL508f5RaXhDur